It is currently Tue Aug 22, 2017 5:31 pm



All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Our Sponsors





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 14, 2011 9:37 am 
Offline
Average Poster
Average Poster

Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 5:38 pm
Posts: 7
Breezy_Ann wrote:
I get what he is saying. Now this is just my take on what he is trying to say and i could have misinterpreted it. I think he is saying that addicts have delusions about there use, what it is really doing to their lives, etc. I do think when in active addiction we do not live in reality. We become obsessed with our doc. I don't think he meant to imply that a true psychotic break and addiction are in the same league just that addicts in active addiction do have a break from reality. I know for me I was not living in the real world.

My take on his post is just that there are some similarities to an addicts way of thinking as someone suffering a true break from reality but not near as severe as a true psychotic break. Like I said I could have interpreted it wrong.


Couldn't have said it better myself (and obviously I didn't)!

_________________
Addiction Psychologist Serving the Triangle Area of North Carolina | www.drsethdennis.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 15, 2011 1:15 pm 
Offline
6 Months or More
6 Months or More

Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 6:05 pm
Posts: 253
Breezy_Ann wrote:
I also wanted to add that the severity of an addicts delusional way of thinking can be in varying degrees depending on the person, their doc, length of use, severity of use, etc. Some drugs can cause delusions, take crystal meth for example. I have seen meth users that have extreme breaks from reality. Perhaps a better way to put it is that addicts can have a delusional way of thinking.


I was never a huge stimulant used. I liked E for quite awhile, but I was usually very responsible with it and didn't use it often. Towards the end of my using I got a little bit into cocaine though. I was starting to convince myself that I should just become a professional sports gambler lol. Take off to vegas and all that. :lol:

I like placing a bet here and there, and am okay.... but nowhere near being able to do it as a profession.

Anyways, denial comes in all sorts of forms and effects people in many different ways.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Ummm
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
Average Poster
Average Poster

Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 10:41 am
Posts: 29
The consensus among most professionals and recovering addicts is that “clean”, when used in the context of recovery, means drug-free. Having all mood-altering substances out of our systems is necessary before the changes that addiction creates in our brains can be repaired. As long as drugs that modify the reward system (which includes all recreational drugs) are in our bodies, repair and normalization cannot begin. When we are on Suboxone or methadone maintenance, we are still addicted¹, and our brains are essentially in the same condition as when we were actively using other opioid drugs. It would seem to be pushing things to call us clean.


Top
 Profile  
 
Our Sponsors
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 4:49 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:04 pm
Posts: 424
Then I would say the same thing about taking my antidepressant every day. Lexapro. Because, I would go into withdraws without it and it does alter my mood. So I guess I don't focus so much on semantics. I know that while I take antidepressant every day for my depression and I take a suboxone every day for my addiction, I am NO LONGER using my full agonist drug of choice Oxy's or Vicodin. My life has improved so much with the use of medicine that I don't see why I should get off of everything so I can say I'm CLEAN by definition. It is what is working great for me and I have no problem remembering to take my medication every day so I can lead a normal life.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:43 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member

Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 4:38 pm
Posts: 386
I agree raudy.

It's all in how you treat it and think about it. Nobody else can determine how clean you are but you. You know how you feel, how you think, what you do, and if you take your suboxone correctly.

In the past I just took suboxone and did nothing else for my recovery. This is what I consider being "dirty" on suboxone. If you just take it and don't go to meetings, counseling, or basically try to change your behaviors /life.

The only argument I hear alot that I don't like at all is when folks say it's like a diabetic taking insulin or something. It isn't. It is still a very powerful opiate. Not an m&m.

You just have to remember what you are taking and more importantly why you are taking it.

This disease is not a game. It's nothing to joke about. It WILL kill you if you aren't careful.

That's why we need to do everything we can to get better and STAY better.

Opiate addicts have the bleakest outlooks of all addicts. That's why many say it's impossible to stay clean especially more than a year.

So. Keep your mind in an atmosphere of recovery, keep taking the right amount of suboxone, and prove those people wrong!

;-)

MM1


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 11:21 am 
Offline
Average Poster
Average Poster

Joined: Wed May 01, 2013 10:41 am
Posts: 29
Antidepressants do not modify your reward system it builds your serotonin gradually over a span of weeks. And its non narcotic. Antidepressants would not be considered a relapse by any means. Just my opinion, any narcotic you take including methadone suboxone or subutex would make you not clean. In my eyes. Just mine.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: clean or sober?
PostPosted: Fri May 03, 2013 10:16 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:48 pm
Posts: 52
I have been on subs for 14 months. I was 3 days in my inpatient rehab and I had a girl ask me (she was an alcoholic and and used pills some, once she realized she replaced alcohol with pills she sought help) anyways she said "how can you consider yourself clean on Subs?" She was asking in a non-judgemental way. So I replied with little thought, "I can't really say I am clean, but I am sober."

That is my opinion, and while to some clean and sober are the same. I guess in my eyes they are not. While on pills, my life revolved around them. With Suboxone my life revolves around itself. So not to offend any, I have found that this reply usually stuns most non-addict or anti-suboxone people. I don't have to justify the means, just the end result. :P

Again this is my opinion.

_________________
"Every saint has a past, therefore every sinner has a future"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 2:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:48 pm
Posts: 1346
Location: oregon coast
here's a good write up from the subox-doc, I was too lazy to look back thru the pages to see If I already posted it....

http://www.suboxonetalkzone.com/bupreno ... r-defects/

AND.....(love the last line of this article)
and my apologies, if I've already posted these two things in this thread.....


http://www.thefix.com/content/stigma-ma ... atment9216

The Truth About Suboxone

Studies show that maintenance therapy is the most effective treatment for opiate addiction. So why are abstinence fundamentalists so bitterly against it?


By Maia Szalavitz

12/02/11


The Great Suboxone Debate
Moderation vs. Abstinence: What's More Effective?
What are the negative side effects of Suboxone?
Suboxone Helps Oxy Addicts Kick the Habit


While reading Joshua Lyon’s recent account in "Jagged Little Pill Head" of recovering from opioid addiction, I was enraged by his characterization of buprenorphine (Subutex, Suboxone) as a “chemical crutch” and “the very drug that was keeping me from doing other drugs.” This outdated and stigmatizing attitude towards maintenance treatment can—and frequently does—kill hundreds of struggling addicts who depend on these meds to stay off the streets. Lyon is typical of a large contingent of so-called recovery experts—from Dr. Drew to many 12-step participants—who continue to publicly push this perspective, despite decades of evidence to the contrary.

That's why it was pleasantly surprising that the issue got a public airing on, of all places, late-night TV. Kristen Johnston, star of the '90s TV hit 3rd Rock From the Sun, was a guest on The David Letterman Show on Monday, discussing her new addiction and recovery memoir Guts, including a pull-no-punches account of how her daily Vicodin–cum–wine consumption ate a hole in her stomach and caused her guts to explode—a life-threatening moment that led her to get clean. Letterman asked her if she used any "pharmacological medications" to help her recover from her opiate addiction, and Johnston said that she sure as hell did and the drug was called Suboxone and it was very effective and anyone who had a problem with that could shove it. Well, that was her tone if not her exact words. Johnston's admission is undoubtedly a first for a celebrity on the recovery circuit.

Even the Betty Ford Center agrees that people taking daily methadone or buprenorphine should be considered every bit as "in recovery" as those who just “don’t drink and go to meetings.” A 2007 consensus panel to define recovery convened by that august facility put it plainly: "To be explicit, formerly opioid-dependent individuals who take naltrexone, buprenorphine or methadone as prescribed and are abstinent from alcohol and all other non-prescribed drugs would meet this consensus definition of sobriety."

So why do even people like Lyon—who benefited from bupe himself—continue to see maintenance as “cheating” and as some kind of limbo between the hell of active drug addiction and the heaven of abstinence-based recovery?

There are several reasons, but they all mostly boil down to the mistaken notion that people on maintenance are somehow “always high” or not “emotionally” sober. This misunderstanding rests on an ignorance of basic pharmacology. With most psychoactive drugs, the pattern of use has an enormous impact on the drug experience. This is abundantly clear with opioids. Take them irregularly in varying doses and you will relatively reliably experience a robust high. But take the same exact drug on a regular schedule at the same exact dose and you will develop a tolerance that makes getting high virtually impossible.


Some in abstinence-based recovery feel compelled to proselytize about the dangers of the substances they once could not live without. This “drug-free” rhetoric helps them avoid temptation. It also gives the added buzz of self-righteousness that comes from feeling superior to others.

Lyon’s claims about getting high on Suboxone are almost certainly related to taking it irregularly or in varying doses. Like any opioids, Suboxone and methadone can cause highs when taken this way.

Tolerance is why addicted people escalate the amount of drugs they take and often feel that they are always chasing—but rarely achieving—that elusive ecstasy they experienced early on. It is also why people on opioid maintenance, including heroin itself, can function without being cognitively, emotionally or physically impaired. Even car-driving performance has been found to be safe in reviews of the data on opioid-tolerant patients. Nonetheless abstinence proponents like Dr. Drew and addict authors like Lyons not only portray these medications as inferior, but implicitly or explicitly push addicts to stop taking them, even when the meds are working.

That can be deadly—as it apparently was for two of the patients Dr. Drew detoxed from maintenance, Mike Starr, the former bassist in Alice in Chains, and film and TV actor Jeff Conaway. Both victims of Celebrity Rehab With Dr. Drew died of overdose or related issues, the risk of which is very far reduced by maintenance treatment. Research repeatedly finds that when access to maintenance is reduced or eliminated, deaths from drug overdose rise, as do rates of infection with HIV, hepatitis C and other blood-borne diseases. In fact, patients on maintenance treatment have a death rate three to four times lower than those who leave it.

It is clear that maintenance saves lives.

Another misconception that fuels the stigma of maintenance in the recovery community is that the use of opioids is inherently “numbing” and therefore people on these drugs are emotionally deadened or at least diminished. There are two problems with this argument. First, tolerance to opioid effects often includes tolerance to this emotional distancing as well. Second, different people respond to opiate effects in different ways. Those who are highly emotionally sensitive may actually benefit from taking a chill pill; methadone or buprenorphine can allow them to react normally instead of overreacting to everyday experience. Paradoxically, being less oversensitive to their own emotions may make their behavior toward others more sensitive.

Because individual responses to opioids are extremely variable—opioid-receptor genes are among the brain's most heterogeneous—maintenance can be numbing for some people and not for others. You may find methadone uncomfortably distancing but buprenorphine effective, while I may find the opposite. The bottom line is that a drug that makes one person miserable can be magnificently beneficial for another.

Beyond the issues of pharmacology and individual variance, one final factor also comes into play in the widespread disdain of maintenance. This is the need of a certain type of person in recovery to demonize the drugs to which they were previously addicted in service of their own abstinence. Because they rightly fear relapse, some who favor abstinence-based recovery feel compelled to proselytize about the dangers of the substances they once felt they could not live without—and often continue to crave. This “anti-drug” or “drug-free” rhetoric helps them avoid temptation. It also gives the added buzz of self-righteousness that comes from feeling superior to others.

I certainly understand this small-minded, mean-spirited attitude; I’ve been guilty of it myself. However, the self-aware—and adult—approach is to distinguish what works for you and your own recovery from what may work for others.

It’s not necessary for maintenance to be bad to make abstinence good. Such black-and-white thinking about methadone and buprenorphine is both divisive and dangerous. Recovery requires acceptance—and that includes acceptance of a diverse range of recovery methods and experiences.

And if acceptance is beyond your reach, then the least you can do is keep your opinions to yourself.

_________________
anyone can give up,
its the easiest thing in the world to do, but to
hold it together, when everyone would understand if you fell apart
That's TRUE STRENGTH
http://almostoneyearclean.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 2:20 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster

Joined: Tue Apr 30, 2013 11:33 am
Posts: 80
Suboxone is a mood altering substance.......not everything is black white.....


Top
 Profile  
 
   
 Post subject: Abstinence
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 8:54 pm 
Offline
Power Poster
Power Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:48 pm
Posts: 52
I think part of the problem is for years the only help an addict or alcoholic had was AA, or rehab to quit. And their way to quit is cold turykey, never do it again. It rarely succeds. I think years in the future, unfortunately not now, Suboxone will be the accepted practice. The abstinence approach has been the only way for a long time. Just because something is around for a long time doesn't make it right, or wrong. My issue is, and I don't mean to offend anyone, is that we are all adults, in a country with so many freedoms, why do we have so many other people telling us what to do? I, like many others, have made a decision on how to handle my addiction. It is my business and my choice.

Remember this is my opinion, not meant to offend, but I really feel strongly that it is my decision to make, Suboxone or no Suboxone. I understand the need to debate and discuss things, but it should be done with keeping in mind that everyone is entitled to their own thoughts and opinions. I have never said to anyone, "you're stupid, why aren't you on Suboxone/Methadone?". We have a freedom to choose, but not the freedom to make other people do things how we want them to. Thank you for listening to my ramble.

_________________
"Every saint has a past, therefore every sinner has a future"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Abstinence
PostPosted: Sat May 04, 2013 11:12 pm 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2011 11:48 pm
Posts: 1346
Location: oregon coast
honeybun wrote:
I think part of the problem is for years the only help an addict or alcoholic had was AA, or rehab to quit. And their way to quit is cold turykey, never do it again. It rarely succeds. .



I happen to think you are on to something here........

and I do NOT blame those who did it this way,,, I don't blame them for being at least a little pissy that

"you got it easy" "just take the meds and your okay,,, there was no MAGIC pill when I QUIT"

you know,,, can't blame them..... right?

I like how romeo calls it "white knuckling"
that's EXACTLY what it is, and while that may carry you for awhile the outlook ain't so great....

anyways,
just wanted to say, i agree, and the best quote I've heard, or read is.....

"I'll keep my garden and you keep yours"

pretty much sums it up.......

_________________
anyone can give up,
its the easiest thing in the world to do, but to
hold it together, when everyone would understand if you fell apart
That's TRUE STRENGTH
http://almostoneyearclean.blogspot.com/


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun May 05, 2013 12:46 am 
Offline
Long Time Member
Long Time Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:02 pm
Posts: 1002
I don't think it matters whether we are clean or whether we are not. It's just semantics, politics, bullshit. What matters is that we have chosen to point our feet in the direction of living rather than dieing. As long as we do that, our feet are pointed in the right direction ... the rest is just buttfluff.

ps whatever tearj3rker said was gold.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 03, 2013 11:00 am 
Offline
Average Poster
Average Poster

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2012 2:38 pm
Posts: 16
I know this is an old thread, but...

If using suboxone therapy properly, including not abusing it or any other substance, then one is in remission. That's a word that should be used, rather than clean. Words like clean or dirty only perpetuate stigmas and stereotypes. Words like active addiction and remission should be used, as they are far more accurate. But in the general use of the word, if you're following treatment properly, properly being as described above, then you're in remission, and thus you are clean. Just like other meds help put other diseases into remission. I go to NA, but I don't share that I'm on suboxone with anybody unless I really trust them. This is because many in the program have a very misguided and misinformed perception of what suboxone is. If you're sponsor or anybody else in NA or AA is telling you you are not clean because you take suboxone, then they clearly are misinformed and don't know what they are talking about, they just going with the general view that many have in NA, which again, is based on misinformation, and if they're telling you to get off suboxone, well they aren't you're doctor and they clearly don't have your best interests in mind, even though they may be convinced they do. You should consult your doctor, and if they're the type to make you feel dirty, as someone said, and run a shady practice, find another, if possible. This isn't always an option, sadly, but there is still factual information out there, if you know how to identify reliable sources and wade through the BS of misinformation, such as drugs.com and soberrecovery.com, as Junig pointed out in a blog post. Try the NAABT for info on how addiction is a disease, based on how it alters your brain, which it does, and how using suboxone doesn't mean you're dirty or not sober. There's a difference between being chemically dependent in a life saving medication and being in active addiction. Many legit medications (which, suboxone is one) for legitimate diseases and illnesses (which addiction is one) cause varying degrees of chemical dependency. This isn't me defending a medication just to justify my use of it, just trying to dispel some of the potentially very harmful myths surrounding remission/clean vs active addiction/dirty and suboxone use as treatment for a serious, fatal if untreated disease. It's interesting to me how much I hear, in NA at every meeting that addiction is a chronic, fatal illness and all this other stuff about it being a disease, yet unlike most diseases, they find it equivalent to active addiction to treat a disease with medicine that exists for that purpose, because they don't understand it, or whatever. It's frustrating when I hear someone bring it up in a meeting about how they want off or recently got off it and how terrible it was, because I hear them simply repeating the EXACT same rhetoric that everybody else in the groups says against suboxone, even the ones who never even took it. Anybody in NA with clean time will tell you they don't know everything, well most anybody, so don't assume they know what they're talking about with suboxone treatment either. It's just their own opinions, but it's not fact. If you have a good doctor, go talk to him about your concerns, or check out the NAABT, or do some research of actual studies.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Our Sponsors
Suboxone Forum latest topics RSS feed Subscribe to the entire forum
 

 

 
Fond Du Lac Psychiatry
Dr. Jeffrey Junig, M.D., Ph.D.

  • Board Certified Psychiatrist
  • Asst Clinical Professor, Medical College of Wisconsin

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group